Categories
Victorian

Unlucky Friday 13th, 1899

Friday 13th today, and I started wondering how long this idea of an unlucky tradition had been around. It sounds ancient, and apparently does have medieval origins in that, at least, Fridays and the number 13 were individually seen as being unlucky. But in the UK, in popular culture, it seems to be much more recent that I imagined.

I found this 1899 article from the London Morning Post, informing its readers of the tradition, which they describe as a piece of Belgian folklore. The Belgian people, being “exceedingly superstitious“, apparently tried to ensure their undertakings were as minimal as possible on the day, “few letters and telegrams will be despatched, the takings of shopkeepers will be small, journeys will be avoided, cabs and trams will be looked at askance, boats will be shunned like the plague, and the theatres will be deserted.

14th January 1899, London Morning Post

In 1899, as in 2017, the first Friday 13th of the year was in January. This, so the article says, means “an evil augury for the year, and the superstitious will inevitably say that we are destined to witness great disasters before twelve months have expired.” I’m not woo enough to be worried about Friday 13th as a rule, but with the Curious Orange being inaugurated (note the relationship with the word augury!) next week….well, that sounds about right.

17th January 1899, London Morning Post

I loved reading this, a letter sent to the paper a few days later, from a correspondent who is delighted to read of this superstition, having noted in their own lives the unluckiness of Friday and the number 13, and especially both together. “In short, as things stand, so great has my horror of the combination become that I fear ere Friday 13th October, I will have qualified for the coroner.”

Categories
1900-1949 Food & Drink

Lobscouse and Witches, 1936

Today is the day for “Lobscouse and Witches” as I discovered from this magical-sounding 1936 article. The 11th January 1936 being a Saturday, it’s talking about Tuesday 7th January, the day after Twelfth Night. The day when an old-fashioned Northern tradition apparently meant that people ate lobscouse, drank lamb’s wool and set fire to their wheat to scare witches away.

Bath Chronicle, 11th January 1936
Bath Chronicle, 11th January 1936

Living in Liverpool, I am well acquainted with lobscouse. These days it’s simply called scouse, a beef or lamb (or both) stew for which every family had their own recipe. Being an adopted Liverpudlian, I had to create my own, and after a few attempts, this is now my family recipe. I prefer the old-fashioned taste of an oxo cube here.

Scouse
350g each of cubed beef and lamb
2 onions
Squirt of brown sauce
Squirt of tomato ketchup
5 large carrots, chopped
1.5-2 kg King Edward potatoes, in small and larger chunks
Dash of Worcestershire sauce
4 oxo cubes
Water to cover

  • Brown the meat in oil, add the onions and soften slightly.
  • Stir in a good squirt of both ketchup and brown sauce.
  • Add the rest of the vegetables, a dash of Worcestershire sauce, crumble the Oxo cubes on top and add enough water to cover.
  • Simmer for two hours, adding more water if needed. The smaller pieces of potato will have disintegrated to thicken the stew.
  • Serve with pickled red cabbage and bread and butter.
Bowl of Scouse
Bowl of Scouse

Lamb’s Wool is something I’ve never tried before – it’s spiced apple pulp mulled with sugar and ale. I used the recipe from the Oakden recipe archive. The origin of its name is a matter of debate. In the article above, it comes from “Lamb of God”.  But other explanations suggest it comes from either the wooly-looking froth on top of the ale, or as a derivative of the ancient Celtic pagan festival of La mas ubal, meaning ‘Day of the Apple Fruit’.

I used Ghost Ship ale for this, the name appeals to me ever since my investigations into the Ourang Medan. I also made a non-alcoholic version using ginger ale, but you don’t need the extra sugar for that. Together the scouse and the lamb’s wool are quite a combination to keep the winter chill out.

Lamb’s Wool
1.5 Litres of real ale or cider
6 small cooking apples, cored
1 nutmeg freshly grated
1 tsp ground ginger
150g brown sugar

  • Preheat the oven to 120C, core the apples and bake for about an hour on a lightly greased baking tray, until pulpy and the skins come easily away.
  • In a large saucepan add the sugar, cover in a small amount of the ale or cider and heat gently. Stir continuously until the sugar has dissolved. Then add in the ground ginger and grate in the whole of the nutmeg. Stir, and keeping the pan on a gentle simmer, slowly add in all the rest of the ale. Leave for 10 minutes on a gentle heat.
  • Take the baked apples out of the oven to cool slightly for 10 minutes – they should now be soft and pulpy. Scoop out the baked flesh into a bowl, discarding the skin. Then take a fork and mash this apple pulp up, while it is still warm, into a smooth purée with no lumps. Add the apple purée into the ale, mixing it in with a whisk.
  • Let the saucepan continue to warm everything through for thirty minutes, on a very gentle heat, until ready to drink. When warmed through use the whisk again for a couple of minutes (or use a stick blender) to briskly and vigorously froth the drink up and mix everything together. The apple and light froth will float to the surface, and depending on how much you have whisked it, the more it looks like lamb’s wool. Note: to traditionally froth drinks up they were normally poured continuously between two large serving jugs to get air into the drink.
  • Ladle the hot Lambswool into heat-proof mugs or glasses and grate over some nutmeg, or pour the drink into a communal bowl (with several thick pieces of toast in the bottom) to pass around if wassailing.
And a glass of Lamb’s Wool
Categories
Uncategorized

A New Year’s Song, 1875

Happy new year!

I think about half of us are hoping for a better 2017 than 2016, and I personally have my fingers crossed that there’s a kind of yin/yang effect between 2016 and 2017, with a stream of the world’s baddies meeting the Grim Reaper this year instead. I’ve got a little list if he needs any help. Unfortunately the events of 2016 seem like merely the prelude for the full 2017 spectacle, but we’ll see.

Today’s post, in the spirit of hope, is a piece of ephemera, a Victorian New Year card, complete with song. These kind of cards were often pasted into scrapbooks at the time.

A New Year's Song card, 1875
A New Year’s Song card, 1875
Categories
1950-1999 Food & Drink

How to Slim after Christmas, 1953

Too soon to think about the post-Christmas diet?

Here’s a diet plan from 1953, taken from William Banting’s “reducing diet” from 90 years earlier. I remember people of my grandparents generation would still sometimes refer to dieting as “banting”.

Dundee Courier, 24th December 1953
Dundee Courier, 24th December 1953

It’s not far removed from current advice, being based on proteins, with little carbohydrate and mainly avoiding sugar. Pleasingly, there seems to be quite a lot of booze involved – I count that you can have up to five drinks a day. You’re allowed two or three glasses of claret, sherry or madeira at lunchtime, and another couple at supper. Maybe it is an ideal post Christmas diet, just eat the leftover turkey, drink the leftover booze and somehow avoid those tins of Roses and, in my case this year, a large batch of Nigella-recipe mince pies with large blobs of thick brandy cream on top.

Still, there’s no point thinking about this until January. As Douglas Adams partly said, time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so, and the week in between Christmas and New Year exists in its own little bubble outside of time and space.

Categories
Victorian

Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Dinner, 1835

I was pretty pleased recently to buy a 1904 Cassell’s Public Library edition of Charles Dickens pieces for 10p – from Henry Bohn Books in Liverpool, one of my favourite shops in the world.

In the book is this, “A Christmas Dinner”, in which he describes an imagined, idealised version of the family Christmas meal. Written in 1835, it predates 1843’s A Christmas Carol, which seems to have used various elements of it, especially in the descriptions of Scrooge’s nephews Christmas gathering.

The reference to the missing child by the hearth is chilling as it reminds you that the horror of infant mortality was a commonplace experience for parents at this time. The redemption of Aunt Margaret, cast out for marrying a poor man without parental permission, is also an interesting piece of social commentary. In all, it’s quite striking that, nearly 200 years later, this is still a recognisable celebration to us in many respects. Dickens has influenced our conception of Christmas more than anyone else, and his vision is still the ideal Christmas, I think – food, games and family good cheer.

Who can be insensible to the outpourings of good feeling, and the honest interchange of affectionate attachment, which abound at this season of the year? A Christmas family-party! We know nothing in nature more delightful! There seems a magic in the very name of Christmas. Petty jealousies and discords are forgotten; social feelings are awakened, in bosoms to which they have long been strangers; father and son, or brother and sister, who have met and passed with averted gaze, or a look of cold recognition, for months before, proffer and return the cordial embrace, and bury their past animosities in their present happiness. Kindly hearts that have yearned towards each other, but have been withheld by false notions of pride and self-dignity, are again reunited, and all is kindness and benevolence! Would that Christmas lasted the whole year through (as it ought), and that the prejudices and passions which deform our better nature, were never called into action among those to whom they should ever be strangers!

The Christmas family-party that we mean, is not a mere assemblage of relations, got up at a week or two’s notice, originating this year, having no family precedent in the last, and not likely to be repeated in the next. No. It is an annual gathering of all the accessible members of the family, young or old, rich or poor; and all the children look forward to it, for two months beforehand, in a fever of anticipation. Formerly, it was held at grandpapa’s; but grandpapa getting old, and grandmamma getting old too, and rather infirm, they have given up house-keeping, and domesticated themselves with uncle George; so, the party always takes place at uncle George’s house, but grandmamma sends in most of the good things, and grandpapa always will toddle down, all the way to Newgate Market, to buy the turkey, which he engages a porter to bring home behind him in triumph, always insisting on the man’s being rewarded with a glass of spirits, over and above his hire, to drink “a merry Christmas and a happy new year” to aunt George. As to grandmamma, she is very secret and mysterious for two or three days beforehand, but not sufficiently so to prevent rumours getting afloat that she has purchased a beautiful new cap with pink ribbons for each of the servants, together with sundry books, and pen-knives, and pencil–cases, for the younger branches; to say nothing of divers secret additions to the order originally given by aunt George at the pastry-cook’s, such as another dozen of mince-pies for the dinner, and a large plum-cake for the children.

On Christmas Eve, grandmamma is always in excellent spirits, and after employing all the children, during the day, in stoning the plums, and all that, insists, regularly every year, on uncle George coming down into the kitchen, taking off his coat, and stirring the pudding for half an hour or so, which uncle George good-humouredly does, to the vociferous delight of the children and servants. The evening concludes with a glorious game of blind-man’s-buff, in an early stage of which grandpapa takes great care to be caught, in order that he may have an opportunity of displaying his dexterity.

On the following morning, the old couple, with as many of the children as the pew will hold, go to church in great state: leaving aunt George at home dusting decanters and filling casters, and uncle George carrying bottles into the dining-parlour, and calling for corkscrews, and getting into everybody’s way.

When the church–party return to lunch, grandpapa produces a small sprig of mistletoe from his pocket, and tempts the boys to kiss their little cousins under it – a proceeding which affords both the boys and the old gentleman unlimited satisfaction, but which rather outrages grandmamma’s ideas of decorum, until grandpapa says that when he was just thirteen years and three months old, he kissed grandmamma under a mistletoe too, on which the children clap their hands, and laugh very heartily, as do aunt George and uncle George; and grandmamma looks pleased, and says, with a benevolent smile, that grandpapa was an impudent young dog, on which the children laugh very heartily again, and grandpapa more heartily than any of them.

But all these diversions are nothing to the subsequent excitement when grandmamma in a high cap, and slate-coloured silk gown; and grandpapa with a beautifully plaited shirt-frill, and white neckerchief; seat themselves on one side of the drawing-room fire, with uncle George’s children and little cousins innumerable, seated in the front, waiting the arrival of the expected visitors. Suddenly a hackney-coach is heard to stop, and uncle George, who has been looking out of the window, exclaims “Here’s Jane!” on which the children rush to the door, and helter-skelter down-stairs; and uncle Robert and aunt Jane, and the dear little baby, and the nurse, and the whole party, are ushered up-stairs amidst tumultuous shouts of “Oh, my!” from the children, and frequently repeated warnings not to hurt baby from the nurse. And grandpapa takes the child, and grandmamma kisses her daughter, and the confusion of this first entry has scarcely subsided, when some other aunts and uncles with more cousins arrive, and the grown-up cousins flirt with each other, and so do the little cousins too, for that matter, and nothing is to be heard but a confused din of talking, laughing, and merriment.

A hesitating double knock at the street-door, heard during a momentary pause in the conversation, excites a general inquiry of “Who’s that?” and two or three children, who have been standing at the window, announce in a low voice, that it’s “poor aunt Margaret”. Upon which, aunt George leaves the room to welcome the new-comer; and grandmamma draws herself up, rather stiff and stately; for Margaret married a poor man without her consent, and poverty not being a sufficiently weighty punishment for her offence, has been discarded by her friends, and debarred the society of her dearest relatives. But Christmas has come round, and the unkind feelings that have struggled against better dispositions during the year, have melted away before its genial influence, like half-formed ice beneath the morning sun. It is not difficult in a moment of angry feeling for a parent to denounce a disobedient child; but, to banish her at a period of general good-will and hilarity, from the hearth round which she has sat on so many anniversaries of the same day, expanding by slow degrees from infancy to girlhood, and then bursting, almost imperceptibly, into a woman, is widely different. The air of conscious rectitude, and cold forgiveness, which the old lady has assumed, sits ill upon her; and when the poor girl is led in by her sister, pale in looks and broken in hope – not from poverty, for that she could bear, but from the consciousness of undeserved neglect, and unmerited unkindness – it is easy to see how much of it is assumed. A momentary pause succeeds; the girl breaks suddenly from her sister and throws herself, sobbing, on her mother’s neck. The father steps hastily forward, and takes her husband’s hand. Friends crowd round to offer their hearty congratulations, and happiness and harmony again prevail.

As to the dinner, it’s perfectly delightful – nothing goes wrong, and everybody is in the very best of spirits, and disposed to please and be pleased. Grandpapa relates a circumstantial account of the purchase of the turkey, with a slight digression relative to the purchase of previous turkeys, on former Christmas-days, which grandmamma corroborates in the minutest particular. Uncle George tells stories, and carves poultry, and takes wine, and jokes with the children at the side-table, and exhilarates everybody with his good humour and hospitality; and when, at last, a stout servant staggers in with a gigantic pudding, with a sprig of holly in the top, there is such a laughing, and shouting, and clapping of little chubby hands, and kicking up of fat dumpy legs, as can only be equalled by the applause with which the astonishing feat of pouring lighted brandy into mince–pies, is received by the younger visitors. Then the dessert! – and the wine! – and the fun! Such beautiful speeches, and such songs, from aunt Margaret’s husband, who turns out to be such a nice man, and so attentive to grandmamma!

Even grandpapa not only sings his annual song with unprecedented vigour, but on being honoured with an unanimous encore, according to annual custom, actually comes out with a new one which nobody but grandmamma ever heard before; and a young scape-grace of a cousin, who has been in some disgrace with the old people, for certain heinous sins of omission and commission – neglecting to call, and persisting in drinking Burton Ale – astonishes everybody into convulsions of laughter by volunteering the most extraordinary comic songs that ever were heard. And thus the evening passes, in a strain of rational good-will and cheerfulness, doing more to awaken the sympathies of every member of the party in behalf of his neighbour, and to perpetuate their good feeling during the ensuing year, than half the homilies that have ever been written, by half the Divines that have ever lived.

Categories
Uncategorized

The Sugar Plum Christmas Book, 1978

Finding this book, this influential but long-lost item of my childhood, was no easy task. While I could remember whole poems and, especially, the cutely disturbing illustrations, the only part of the title I could recall was “Christmas Book”. Which is all but impossible to identify through googling. The search went on for a good few years, sparked up again each Christmas when I remembered its existence and tried, fruitlessly, again.

This year I cracked it – an imageless mention of “Sugar Plum Christmas Book” on Abe Books sparked off a lightbulb moment and when I found a picture of the cover it was a glorious moment. I couldn’t have told you what the cover looked like, and now I’m amazed I ever forgot. Something called “Sugar Plum” would, these days, be pink and fluffy and saccharine, and so the Eastern European peasant vibe, along with all the goblins, beasties and strange little elves inside, is quite striking. The stories and the rest of the contents is charming and nicely written by Jean Chapman, but it’s Deborah Niland’s illustrations which turn it into a special book for me.

The Sugar Plum Christmas Book, 1978

Im not sure where my original book came from. I remember my childhood reading consisted of rather a lot of sold off library books and charity shop finds. I had one of those personalised books where they fill in your name, town and family in the story, except it was second hand, and so it was someone else’s life inside the book. Which I didn’t think was odd at all at the time and I used to read it quite a lot, thinking about this other kid’s life and friends. I also had “St Michael” books from Marks and Spencer, and books bought from the intermittent book stall at school. My new Christmas Book is an ex-library book which apparently sat on a shelf for the whole of the 1990s (something I always find slightly sad).

I read and re-read it, whether it was seasonally appropriate or not. One of the joys of finding it again was that it felt like listening to an album you haven’t heard in 20 years, but you still know all the words to. This poem has certainly been rattling around my head for nearly my whole life.

As has the picture of the naughty dwarves in The Red Cap story, especially the one eating a burger, and the two playing what appears to be a strange nose wrestling game.

It’s full of songs, stories, crafts and recipes. None of which I actually made, but I feel that now I want to, with my own kids. Especially this Nisse puppet.

And maybe I’ll finally work out the tune to the Nasty Little Beasties song too.

The story of the mysterious strangers and the horrible Slybones family, The Way of Wishes, is another one which made a big impression. The descriptions of the Christmas food, and, especially, the vivid picture of the Christmas pudding fight.

But it’s this picture which sums up my memory of the atmosphere created by this book. A tiny cottage, like one of those seen in fairy tales, probably in a forest somewhere, full of archaic hospitality and whimsical cheer.

Categories
1900-1949 Adverts Food & Drink

Cadbury’s “99”, 1936

Today’s post began through a fit of annoyance that literally every flavour of Ben and Jerry’s ice cream contains eggs, thereby making a trip to the cinema with my egg-allergic little girl an ice-cream free zone. And it ended with a minor dairy-based historical discovery and an ultimately unfulfilled quest.

So, I was looking up which ice creams contained eggs when I stumbled on the website for The Ice Cream Alliance, and an interesting little section on the wonder that is the Cadbury’s “99”. The “99” being a delicacy that Wikipedia tells me is enjoyed not only in Britain, but also Ireland, South Africa and Australia, and, I need hardly say for British readers, consists of a cone of soft-serve ice-cream, garnished with a specially-sized flake chocolate bar.

I was forced to go to the park and buy one for illustrative purposes at this point.

Yes, it was nice, thank you
Yes, it was very nice, thank you

Here’s the facts, as we know them. Why is a “99” called a “99”? Good question. It’s a Cadbury’s trademark to describe “a scoop or swirl of soft serve ice cream with a Cadbury chocolate flake in it,” yet no one is clear about the original meaning of the name, including, apparently, Cadbury’s.

From www.ice-cream.org
From www.ice-cream.org

What’s that? A tiny historical mystery, you say? I’m on the case!

The Ice Cream Alliance says Cadbury’s is cagey about the origins of the “99”. Wikipedia at least gives some dates, stating that the “99” as we know it now, cone, ice cream and Flake and all, has been served since 1922.

Although, come on, the Screwball isn’t really a “99” in a plastic cone. There’s a crucial ball of bubblegum at the bottom, and definitely sauce and/or sherbet involved.

From Wikipedia
From Wikipedia

 

An aside – red sauce on a “99”, Wikipedia tells me, is called “monkey blood” in some regions, which is exciting. This is my reference point for sauce on an ice-cream though – “I didn’t ask for sauce.” “I didn’t give you sauce.”

Anyway. Both Wikipedia and Cadbury’s own website date the origin of the Flake itself from 1920, when a Cadbury’s employee shrewdly noted how excess chocolate fell off the moulds in a drizzly, thin, flakey layer. Unfortunately I can find no evidence of adverts in any archives until the 1930s and even Cadbury’s website illustrates the invention of the Flake with a 1960s ad.

What I did find, though, was this. Brand new information – to me at least, and also apparently to Wikipedia and the Ice Cream Alliance, seeing as there’s no mention of it anywhere else I’ve seen. From the British Newspaper Archive, a fairly extensive campaign in 1936 advertising the new invention of the “99”, within adverts for Flake.

Hartlepool Northern Daily Mail, 8th July 1936
Hartlepool Northern Daily Mail, 8th July 1936

It’s obviously a newish thing in 1936 because the hook line is “Have you tried a 99?” Importantly, though, this 99 is not a 99! It’s an ice cream wafer sandwich with two strips of ice cream and a Flake in the middle. Your confectioner will be happy to provide.

Hartlepool Northern Daily Mail, 8th July 1936
Hartlepool Northern Daily Mail, 8th July 1936

Now it seems unlikely to me that in 1922 the “99” came into being, fully formed as we know it today, only to be replaced by something different in 1936, presented as new, and then reverted back at some unspecified point. PLUS, there wasn’t even soft-serve ice cream in the UK until the 1940s, hence this 1936 concoction consisting of ice cream blocks. Depending on who you believe, Maggie Thatcher may or may not have had a hand in developing soft serve for the British market. Which has put me off it a bit.

Still, though, I can’t find mention of this anywhere else, and, you know, maybe Cadbury’s has even forgotten it themselves. I still haven’t got to the bottom of it, but if any readers have any memories of “99” which are different to today, please let me know.

Sussex Agricultural Express, 3rd July 1936
Sussex Agricultural Express, 3rd July 1936
Sussex Agricultural Express, 3rd July 1936
Sussex Agricultural Express, 3rd July 1936
Categories
Pharmaceuticals Victorian

Bad Breasts, 1872

I do love an advert for a Victorian “cure-all”. Here we have Holloway’s Ointment in an advert from 1872.

It claims to cure (deep breath) – coughs, colds, bronchitis, asthma, irregular action of the heart, bad legs, bad breasts, ulcers, abscesses, wounds, sores of all kinds, “the depraved humours of the body will be quickly removed”, gout, rheumatism, neuralgic pains, “skin diseases, however desperate, radically cured”, scald heads, itch, blotches on the skin, scrofulous sores or king’s evil, dropsical swellings, paralysis, burns, bunions, chilblains, chapped hands, corns, contracted and stiff joints, fistula, gout, glandular swellings, lumbago, piles, sore nipples, sore throats, scurvy, sore heads, tumours and ulcers.

Bedfordshire Mercury, 2nd November 1872
Bedfordshire Mercury, 2nd November 1872

It came in a lovely pot.

Holloway's Ointment
Holloway’s Ointment

Thomas Holloway, the founder of Holloway’s Ointment, died in 1883 as one of the richest men in England. At that point Holloway’s were spending an incredible £50,000 a year on advertising the products, but unsurprisingly, contemporary analysis of the ointment showed that it contained little of medicinal value.

Categories
1900-1949

A Burglary Comedy, 1933

Do people still have “spirit guides”? They used to be pretty popular among fraudulent Victorian mediums, stage psychics and Jim Morrison in that film about The Doors.

They’re usually supposed to be helpful, I thought, but not this one, who encouraged the excitingly named phrenologist Cosmo Leon Kendal to reveal his previous conviction for shooting at a police officer during his trial for inciting to cheat an insurance company. His counsel advised him not to reveal he’d been in prison for 14 years for the former offence, but “he said he had been guided by the spirit world to lay his past frankly before the jury.” His argument was that the policeman investigating knew fine well of his past offence and he was being harassed on account of it – “I am a marked man.”

I suppose you could commend him for his honesty, but it was enough to help convince the jury he must be a wrong ‘un and he was convicted and sentenced to 12 months hard labour.

Edinburgh Evening News, 10th February 1933
Edinburgh Evening News, 10th February 1933

HIS SPIRIT GUIDE
——
PROMPTS MAN TO REVEAL PAST CONVICTION
——
A BURGLARY COMEDY

Cosmo Leon Kendal (43), described as a phrenologist, of Streatham, London, revealed in evidence at the Old Bailey today, that in 1911 he was sentenced to 14 years penal servitude for shooting at a police officer.

He was now charged with inciting another man to conspire with him to cheat and defraud an insurance company.

Mr S. T. T. James, defending, said that Kendal had revealed his 14 years sentence against the advice of counsel and solicitor. Mr James added: “He said he had been guided by the spirit world to lay his past frankly before the jury.”

It was alleged that Kendal asked another man to commit a burglary at his house, and promised him £10 when a claim was made on the insurance company. While Kendal was away expecting the man to commit the burglary, somebody else got in and removed a considerable quantity of goods. Kendal put in a claim for £514. The other man read of the burglary and told the police.

Kendal, after being sentenced to twelve months hard labour, made a statement. “On November 8,” he said “when Inspector Roberts called on me in reference to the burglary, he knew I was the man who shot Detective-Inspector Askew and had received a sentence of 14 years penal servitude. He was prejudiced and suspicious. I am a marked man.”

The Common Serjeant, Mr Holman Gregory, K.C., said that it was wholly untrue that a man who had been convicted was harassed by the police. “It was your own stupid conceit,” he added “which led you to tell the jury you had been previously convicted. Had you taken the legal advice given you, the jury would have known nothing about it.”

Kendal: Can I appeal?

The Common Serjeant: Yes.

Categories
1900-1949 Food & Drink Victorian

Allergies in the Past

Allergic reactions are on the increase in all parts of the developed world – asthma, hay-fever and food allergies are all more common than they used to be, although no-one has a definitive answer as to why this is. Increased use of antibiotics, the more processed nature of the food we eat, the general changes occurring in our natural environment – these are all put forward as potentially playing their part in making our immune system more sensitive to allergies.

Despite the higher visibility of allergies, such as the new nut-free policies developed in schools, there’s still a sense among some people that this is all a lot of old nonsense, that there weren’t allergies in the old days, and it’s the same thing as people self-diagnosing intolerances to various foodstuffs. As the mother of a little girl with alarming allergies to egg and mustard, people not taking the consequences of exposure to allergens seriously is terrifying. Going out to eat is a minefield – ask most serving staff about which food contains mustard in their menu and I guarantee they will tell you that they don’t have mustard in their food, unless something is specifically described as such – a ham and mustard sandwich, for example. Whereas, if you check their allergy information (if they indeed have it), you’ll find egg and mustard everywhere in the dressings and the flavourings.

This talk of allergies barely existing in the past got me thinking. It may be more common now, but I couldn’t believe that it wasn’t always there, in some way. By chance, I saw a newspaper article in the British Newspaper Archive which mentioned “nettle rash” and I almost passed over it, thinking it referred to an actual rash caused by stinging nettles. But it goes on to clarify that it refers to “some kind of food that disagrees with the sufferer” – so what would be called hives or uticaria now. “Opening medicine” is advised to be given, which I now know is another name for laxatives. Makes sense – it seems like everything could be cured by laxatives if you look at old adverts. But I can see the logic here in that the aim is to expel the offending foodstuff from the body as fast as you can.

The Sunderland Echo, 7th August 1934
The Sunderland Echo, 7th August 1934

“Nettle rash is often very alarming” this article says, and allergic reactions like this are scary to see. “This affection is almost invariably due to mistakes in diet, such as giving a child unripe fruit,” it says, which isn’t a cause of an allergic reaction that I’ve heard before. It sounds like the causes of the reaction were still very misunderstood.

Dundee People's Journal, 7th April 1917
Dundee People’s Journal, 7th April 1917

It is curious how certain articles of diet affect different individuals; food which is freely partaken of by all the members of the family results in a nettle-rash for only one member.” This 1913 article identifies fish and shellfish as one of the possible causes, which is true – both are allergens that need to be listed by law on food ingredients lists now. The reality of living with severe allergies at a time when this wasn’t properly understood or widely known sounds stressful – “Experience is the only guide…..no one can help you, you must look after yourself.”

Coventry Herald, 5th December 1913
Coventry Herald, 5th December 1913

A soothing lotion for the nettle rash here – lead lotion. Terrifying.

Coventry Herald, 5th December 1913
Coventry Herald, 5th December 1913

This 1930 article mixes together food allergy and contact dermatitis resulting from skin contact with various materials. They can be related (I have heard that an allergy to latex can accompany an allergy to kiwi fruit) but not always.

Gloucester Citizen, 8th Juky 1930
Gloucester Citizen, 8th July 1930

This article is a bit strange. It finally gets onto the correct cause – food allergies such as shellfish and strawberries, but only after a moralising digression that also blames indigestion, over-feeding, lack of cleanliness and the taking of drink such as claret cup – “this latter leads many a young girl to drink and ruin. It is so nicely flavoured; so cooling (?) they think, that a mere sip cannot do any harm. In that mere sip they too often sign away their future happiness or their very souls.”  Or it could be strawberries.

Taunton Courier, 24th July 1907
Taunton Courier, 24th July 1907

In the last resort “a complete change of air will effect an immediate cure” this isn’t prescribed much these days, is it? From reading old books, it seems like people were constantly moving to boarding houses on the coast for a change of air to improve their health. If you’re undergoing an allergic reaction, quickly arrange a holiday.

Dundee Evening Telegraph, 3rd April 1930
Dundee Evening Telegraph, 3rd April 1930

This is spot on, and from 1899 too. “Poisoning by eggs” is a “curious personal idiosyncrasy.” This is a good description of egg allergy, which can result in severe symptoms even by the smallest amount consumed, “even when the egg is disguised in other food” and only a tiny amount of food containing egg on the skin can produce swelling. This is what I recognise from my daughter’s egg allergy.

Whitby Gazette, 29th December 1899
Whitby Gazette, 29th December 1899

This article makes clear that anything could potentially be an allergen to an individual person. “There are certain people to whom practically anything is poisonous.”

Framlingham Weekly News, 13th June 1925
Framlingham Weekly News, 13th June 1925

It’s a relief really, reading these articles from another age, and realising that allergies still existed then. It’s a pretty exhausting way to live, checking absolutely every ingredient list on everything, spending a long time going through the allergy folder in a restaurant and even then sometimes suffering a sudden attack which could have been caused by cross-contamination. But what a relief that at least it’s a lot easier now, now the law’s on our side, and there’s more awareness and information available.